Talk:Frank Broyles

Untitled
Suggestion: Coach Broyles has recently made a great humanitarian contribution with his Coach Broyles Playbook for Alzheimer's Caregivers. This is currently available for free through the Alzheimer's Association. I don't know much about football, but I do know that his work on getting this book to the general public for free is a true public service and a labor of love. It ought to be in his wiki page. thanks Coach Broyles!

Criticism
Please remove the picture of Boryles at Missouri. He was only there for 1 year! That picture should be of Broyles during his time as coach of the Arkansas Razorbacks!

BlackjackTalk keeps removing the criticism section for Broyles. He said there's not criticism of George Bush Jr. on his Wiki, but he should check this link ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bush_Jr.#Criticism_and_public_perception There are several instances of criticism of Broyles, from his use of the N word to his handling of the current fiasco involving the Arkansas football coaching staff. Editorialists in Arkansas have begun calling for Broyles to resign. For this to be an acccurate portrayal of Broyles, the Wiki must include that information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.9.217.229 (talk • contribs).


 * First, please sign your post by putting 4 ~'s in a row at the end of your post. Second, I agree that criticism is sometimes warranted, as long as it does not cross the line into POV territory. As long as references are cited for all criticisms, I see no problem with it being included in the article. (Cardsplayer4life 20:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC))


 * I've added and  tags to the relevant section...I've also contacted  about continually removing that section. A 3RR warning could be applied if it's removed again.
 * I'd like to see all claims sourced, though. In fact, it's necessary, under WP:NPOV that relevant criticisms should be properly sourced. In that sense, if this section goes unsourced for too long, I'll remove it myself. -- Scientizzle 20:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I added some sourcing for the criticisms and tried to NPOV them. Removing criticism sections is not appropriate.  If they are not sourced they should be sourced, if they are not NPOV then they should be NPOV'd.  But to remove criticism sections in their entirety because you don't like criticism of the subject or have a crazy idea that criticism does not belong in an encyclopedia is flat out wrong.24.144.29.144 01:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Help desk request
There is a post on User_talk:VinlFvr.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  18:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)