Talk:Frank Dekum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This article looks great, and so I am passing it to GA status. I just had a couple of comments, neither of which stands in the way of GA: Very nice work, and please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * George H. Williams redirects to a dab page, but I can't figure out to which person this article is referring.
 * Family section, "including Thrushes, Starlings, and Nightingales" I'm don't think these need to be capitalized, but I'm not sure on this...


 * Thank you for taking the time and trouble to review this article and for your comments and kind words. I have repaired the dab and the bird names according to your suggestions. Finetooth (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)