Talk:Frank Erickson

Neutrality
This article is very favorable of the subject. For example:

"Additionally, it is a little-known fact that many of Erickson's profits went to charity. Along with many other ventures, he was a major contributor to the construction of a children's hospital in NYC. His image was bashed by the media because of supposed connections with the mob. These allegations were never proven."

Saying that Erickson was "bashed" by the media is neither the most eloquent nor the most even-handed description, to say the least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.93.184 (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled
If someone has disputed the neutrality of the article, please state your objection. I have edited the text multiple times in order to clear up the issue of "neutrality." The article is scrupulously referenced. If there is no response for one month (today 2/5/08), I'll assume there is no issue and remove the neutrality exception - assuming I can.216.162.26.193 (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)