Talk:Frank Lapidus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Intial review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

The use of wikipedia articles are not acceptable as "reliable sources". These references will need to be replaced with WP:RS. Pyrotec (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * 2 to 10 are referencing episodes of the series. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  01:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that contribution. On that basis I will accept them. Pyrotec (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)