Talk:Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing your article for GA. Below is my evaluation. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

 GA review (see here for criteria)

This article is good as far as it goes. It needs to be fully developed with detailed information. Please see example given above as well as To the Stars (album) for ideas as to what qualities an article on an album for GA status. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): The article lacks lead section and does not follow   MoS layout.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): The material under Grammy Awards is not referenced. b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Gives a general overview b (focused):  Does not provide sufficient detail on the development and production; lacks important sections such as one   critical  reviews as suggested by WikiProject Albums. Please see It's About Time (Christina Milian album) for an example of a GA album article.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: