Talk:Frankenstein (2007 film)

Article creator
For more information talk here Mrmccollough 19:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This isn't a miniseries. It's a one-off drama. Cipher (Talk to the hand) —Preceding comment was added at 10:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * A series is often regarded as 10-15 episodes, whereas a miniseries is often regarded as 4-6 episodes. So I tried searching the net for how many episodes there are to this programme, but IMDB has no relevant info, and neither does ITV's lame excuse of a website. So, before we make any assumptions, can someone look for the amount of episodes? On a side note, the info box needs a lot more info - I've added as much stuff as I currently know. King Wagga 20:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I watched this. It is not a Mini Series, it was a Drama. It was described as a Drama on all the advertising, so i think its fair to say its a drama, whatever made anyone think it was a mini series? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.237.115 (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * "Drama" refers to a genre, not a format of episodes. And, apart from commercials, what "advertising" are you referring to - if it were a one-off, why use any other methods of advertising? Besides, after the first episode ended and the credits rolled, I remember that the reader said it would continue next Wednesday. Sadly, I wasn't watching much TV that day, and thus missed it. And also, what kind of stupid ending was that, if it really were a one-off. I'm not saying it is or isn't a one-off, but from this, I pretty sure it's a miniseries. I might e-mail ITV later for confirmation. King Wagga 18:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Nope. It never said anything about it continuing, there never was either, it was a drama, it was described as a drama on TV ads, and in the TV magazine. This was the only place in which it was called a miniseries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.236.153 (talk) 20:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess it was somehow my imagination of it continuing. But anyway, this was a lame excuse of a... erm... TV movie. Oh well. King Wagga 15:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

oops a red link
i've added julian bleach to the cast list who plays the UX/monster but he comes up as a red link! Should i be bold and create the article--Lerdthenerd 13:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * That decision is yours alone. Add sufficently to avoid speedy deletion. – Conrad T. Pino 18:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Frankenstein (2007) merged
Article Frankenstein (2007) was merged into this article. Click prior content to see last revision before redirect. – Conrad T. Pino 23:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Modern Fankenstein.jpg
Image:Modern Fankenstein.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Modern Fankenstein.jpg
Image:Modern Fankenstein.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)