Talk:Franklin (automobile)

Court Action
This section leaves us in suspense: the outcome is not described!Bill (talk) 01:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 20:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Die casting
I removed "(in fact, he invented the term)" because I cannot find any reference to this. In fact on checking the earliest printed citation found in the Oxford English Dictionary, Franklin is nowhere to be found, except as an advertiser. Nick Beeson (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, maybe he did. But a claim that absolute over such a significant technical domain is going to need a whopping source to support it. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)