Talk:Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries

Please delete this
This article is purely promotional and has no real justification otherwise.

Please Do Not Delete

 * How does a comment get here with no signature? The book is widely used in archaeology courses, that's enough to justify its inclusion.--Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

This book is important as an internal link to verify archaeologic frauds. It should be kept. Pustelnik (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've now found out how to see who added a comment. The only other edit the person made who asked this to be deleted was to put a very rightwing POV on an article, so I'm assuming some such motivation was behind his/her request for deletion.Doug Weller (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes and additions
I'm planning to make some improvements to this article including:
 * 1) Add an infobox with cover image.
 * 2) Add a book synopsis, history, and reception
 * 3) Add book contents with brief descriptions of the chapters.

Suggestions welcome Fracton (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)