Talk:Frazey Ford

Photo
The subject herself said she thought the newer photo was unflattering. It was quickly reverted with a totally incorrect edit comment "unexplained removal of content". How is an edit with a summary saying the photo was unflattering an unexplained removal of content?

Subject also wrote on her user talk page that she thinks the photo makes her look pregnant. I agree that it is a bad photo and will revert back to the old photo.


 * Realistic does not equal 'bad'. Flattering does not equal 'good'. It seems that flattering is more important than factual to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:562:60F4:1:2:42EF:D544 (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

It's great that there's so many bots and users quickly removing vandalism. It'll be even better if editors slowed down and exercised some common sense and courtesy. --CutOffTies (talk) 03:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that it was indeed Frazey Ford who made the edits and not simply someone using the name? As for removing the bit about her growing up in Toronto, what about this article which states: "But for Frazey Ford, growing up in Toronto and rural British Columbia..." (emphasis mine). As for the photo, it was the clearest shot of her face among the entire set. Tabercil (talk) 02:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Regardless of who made the edits, I agree that it is not a flattering photo. The Toronto reference could possibly be circular but who knows.  I added the bit about Toronto way back in 2010 based on a source I can't bring up now so went with what is verified. --CutOffTies (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One of the advantages of being the person who took the shot in question is I know exactly what size & resolution it is. She complains she looks pregnant? Crop! Take a look at File:Frazey Ford at Hillside Festival 2015 (cropped).jpg... Tabercil (talk) 22:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well done, looks good. --CutOffTies (talk) 08:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)