Talk:Fred Keenor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   19:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "He began his football career at his hometown club Cardiff City after impressing in a trial match in 1912 that was organised by his former schoolteacher" - who did he impress?
 * The infobox image needs a caption
 * "Keenor, himself a patriotic man" - try himself a patriot instead
 * "made 21 appearances in the league during the season, scoring 2 goals" - two goals
 * "being transported to an army hospital in Dublin, Ireland" - no need to have 'Ireland' here, I'm sure everybody knows Dublin
 * " After the Final, Keenor stated: "Just because we lost in our very first Cup Final, I don't think there is any cause to get down in the mouth. I can say here and now that one day soon our followers can be sure that Cardiff City will bring that cup to Wales."" - any reason why this quote is italicised?
 * The 'general' subsection in the references should be renamed "bibliography" preferably, but feel free to ignore
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article is well written, comprehensive, and all of the sources check out fine. Once all of those minor prose issues I listed have dealt with then this should pass. It's been a pleasure to review this. JAG UAR   16:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for the review, I think I've fixed all those points. Kosack (talk) 17:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that! I've checked through the article again and am happy that this meets the criteria now. Well done  JAG  UAR   17:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)