Talk:Fred Teeven

Errors in article
"""Had Teeven just informed the Tax department, they would most likely have been able to seize all the money and issue a fine. Rather than making a criminal poorer, Teeven made him richer""" 1. All is under investigation, so conclusions and would-have-beens are speculative 2. 'would most likely have been able to...' is a complete guess without sourcing 3. 'Rather than making a criminal poorer, Teeven made him richer' is irrelevant smear.

For now I'll just note this, but won't edit this article. Hopefully another more objective Wikipedian can restore this article to before these statements were added. Just to be clear: I have no qualms with the article listing facts about the money laundry case. I do have qualms with this POV, inaccurate, speculative, original research and I don't even know how to describe 3.

One could look at the Dutch article ( http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Teeven ) for up-to-date references, like: http://www.parlement.com/id/vjsjf0h58qve/nieuws/fred_teeven_keert_terug_in_de_tweede — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.173.239.112 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)