Talk:Frederick William Franz/Archive 2

Thanks to the one who puts this photo for hearing my petition but the contribution of our dear Bro. Frederick William Franz to Jehovah's people and to humanity is not summarize in those lines, his contribution is far beyond more than being a religious leader. He was a faithful and humble servant of God willing to sacrifice himself to serve others. This article is very, very poor. When you read old Watch tower's articles and saw a reference about him doing something for the sake of the Good Newsin Spain or Canada you could see how he continues to be a fine example of christian conduct and citizenship that inspires others. I suggest to write to the watch tower to receive an accurate bigraphy prepared by an oficial and from a thrustable source.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.79.94.89 (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Has he never been married?

In another Watchtower (May 01, 1987) there is another date of baptism mentioned!

Ray Franz
Why was the reference to Raymond Franz removed? He is Frederick's nephew, and as a one-time member of the governing body, he is arguably the most notable former Jehovah's Witness. I would say that is pretty relevant. Despite all assumptions of good faith, rest assured, I will check on this article daily from this point forward. —PopeFauveXXIII 13:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The neutrally worded and highly pertinent text has been replaced as the last sentence of the first paragraph. Apparently somebody thinks, that when a member of a group's leadership is expelled in shame while a close blood relation is serving as that group's president, it's so insignificant to the latter's article that it ought to be quietly deleted from an anonymous IP. Like I said, I will be checking this article every day, and this will be submitted to arbitration if necessary. —PopeFauveXXIII 13:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Removal of hidden sex-abuse link
im taking this propaganda out:

To IP 200.79.202.12
I welcome you to join me in creating a neutral article through the collaboration of our opposing points of view. However, sweeping censorship of relevant facts without justification on the talk page will be swiftly reverted. --PopeFauveXXIII 06:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)