Talk:Fredokiss

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start

North8000 (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Did you realize this was previously salted at Fredokiss? * Pppery * it has begun... 17:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No I didn't. (is there a way I should have known?) So I just reviewed it as any other new article.  If there's an AFD under the salted name I couldn't find it.  Or even anything to confrim that it's the same subject.  I'd be happy to unreview it if you think that's best or do whatever you think is best.   I can't see taking it to AFD..... it looks like one that would be kept there. I've done several reviews of articles by this creator...they do a lot of work that clearly isn't COI so this doesn't look like COI. North8000 (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay. There wasn't an AfD, just some sockfarm targeting the base name, so I guess I'll just move it there. But I think that's a failure of the NPP process - one of the steps of the NPP flowchart is to check if the article is at the correct title, which would require looking at the base name when reviewing a disambiguated article to see if it is disambiguated properly. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)