Talk:Free statistical software

What?
What is going on in this article? It is poorly written and tries to explain things completely unrelated to the topic. Needs to be majorly cleaned up or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.39.99 (talk) 23:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, you're right. However, it does have some bits and piece within it (e.g. citations of third-party reviews) that at least seem worth moving elsewhere. -- Hoary (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't really see the point of this as an independent article. In fact, it's counter-productive; its existence as such sidetracked me for at least an hour when List of statistical packages was what I really needed.  Perhaps some of the content could be unobtrusively embedded in or linked to it-- but that's what "See Also" is for; I just need to remember to check it.  Eesnyder80302 (talk) 01:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
The top of this article says "This article incorporates text from its corresponding Citizendium article." However, there are two major problems. 1. This article does not just incorporate text, it is really a copy of the citizendium article, word for word. 2. This wikipedia article does not link to the citizendium article.

I'm not sure that I understand all the copyright laws, but just saying this article "incorporates text from" is just dishonest. The people who copied the citizendium article make it appear that they wrote something when they did not. They just copied. I hope the people who copied this article will do the right thing! This wikipedia article should really say it is a copy of the citizendium article and link to that article, here http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Free_statistical_software Socialresearch (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, you're right.


 * There does exist Template:Citizendium copy: visually inadequate but at least with accurate content. However, it's not used anywhere.


 * I thought of asking on the talk page of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, but this seems to be moribund. I'm still wondering what to do. -- Hoary (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Mistitled
Titled "Free statistical software", the article must start with an awkward explanation of how it's not discussing free software. Actually it's about freeware. The article has various other problems and I'm not sure that it merits retention; but if (or as long as) it does, it might better be retitled "Statistics freeware". -- Hoary (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm okay with changing this article to "Free to use statistical software". However, people won't be searching for "free to use statistical software". They would search for "free statistical software". Can they be redirected from "free statistical software" to "free to use statistical software"? Socialresearch (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

updating page
I'll be working on updating this page, off and on for a while. Socialresearch (talk) 23:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)