Talk:Freedom Rally

ummm
I hate to say it but this article is really POV against the city of Boston. While I agree that what the Mayor and the city did re permits was wrong, wording like "Also in 1997, in an act of obvious spite, the City sued MASSCAN..." is very biased. In before someone tells me to BE BOLD and do it myself, that's your jobs.

Also I lol'd at the last edit being on April 20th. --24.63.88.179 (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

In agreement with above: extremely biased article. Cites facts regarding factual statements (dates, participants, etc) but everything else is tainted with bias to say the least. Extremely one sided, and furthermore: talks purely opinion. As above quoted "in an act of obvious spite..." who is that person to say that the city was out for spite, and nothing more? Furthermore, if one wishes to be extraordinarily technical: how can a city be spiteful? A city is incapable of expression spite, or any emotion or action for that matter.

Poor demonstration of objective writing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.54.47 (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Extremely Biased
This article was exhibiting some strong bias in favor of the Freedom Rally organizors. I removed some of the most blatant language, but the content of the article is most likely still selected in a biased manner. Someone with more knowledge of the subject matter should add to the article in a more neutral manner. Andrew Keenan Richardson (talk!) 02:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)