Talk:Freelancers Union

POV
Since there's been no discussion, and in particular no explanation for the POV, I propose to remove it. Richard Pinch (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Comparison of Freelancers Union health plan to other health plans
This article needs a comparison of the costs and benefits of Freelancers Union health plan to other health plans offered in New York State. New York State has relatively cheap, subsidized plans. They used to have a program called Healthy New York.

Remember, under Wikipedia rules )WP:NOR, you can't just go to the Freelancers Union web site, go to another web site, and compare prices and benefits. You have to find a comparison in an independent WP:RS. --Nbauman (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freelancers Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505044222/http://gawker.com:80/339510/freelancers-union-health-benefits-snafu-has-members-fuming to http://gawker.com/339510/freelancers-union-health-benefits-snafu-has-members-fuming

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Need to add content re: Trupo
Founded by insurance experts from Freelancers Union, Trupo is on a mission to even the playing field between freelance and full-time work. We partner with individual freelancers and groups and organizations of all sizes to help build a better freelance ecosystem. Read more about our Partners here. source: https://www.trupo.com/about-trupo
 * Why? — ℜ ob C. alias ALAROB 20:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Unfinished article
This article reads more like a blog post than an encyclopedia article. The fictive blogger has lazily or naively pasted in marketing copy and direct quotes with no attribution. (It's not enough to have a footnote. Readers need to know who said the words, and why it's so important to have the exact verbiage in there. Usually it's not important and a paraphrase is both briefer and clearer, if less glittery.)

The "Policy" section consists of gossip. There is also failure to address the fact that a founder's opinions are not necessarily identical with the policy of the organization she founded. As a result, the article isn't just uniformative; it may be misleading. — ℜ ob C. alias ALAROB 20:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)