Talk:Freida Pinto/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GleekVampire (talk · contribs) 11:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I will review this Good Article nomination. Nominators please be prepared to answer queries raised in the review. — Gleek Vampire  &#124;  talk!  11:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * External links
 * Let's start with some problematic External links as per the tool. There are redirects and dead links, please correct them first. — Gleek Vampire  &#124;  talk!  11:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Early life and modeling career
 * When she was ten, Sushmita Sen won Miss Universe 1994, which turned out to be a defining point in Pinto's life --> Please elaborate. How did Sen's win at Miss Universe become a defining point in her life? Are they related? Does Pinto consider her a role model?
 * She considered Sushmita Sen to be her role model and wanted to become like her. The fact is very well stated in the source. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Acting career
 * Very well written :) No major issues here.
 * Unlike her previous films, Trishna gained positive response from critics --> Can't find a reference for this
 * Done &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Media image and personal life
 * Soon after the release of Slumdog Millionaire, Pinto garnered immense popularity was frequently included among the "Most Beautiful Women in the World" list --> Shouldn't there be a conjunction or something between popularity and was?
 * Fixed &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The same year, Daily Telegraph reported that she was the highest paid Indian actress – she is not considered a Bollywood star as she never appeared in a Bollywood film --> Can you rephrase this sentence? It's a little confusing.
 * Rephrased &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  06:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Overall the article looks pretty good. — Gleek Vampire  &#124;  talk!  13:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: