Talk:French Hill attacks

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is no consensus for this move. We determine consensus based on strength of arguement and the proposer gives no arguement why French Hill Junction attacks is the common name even if it is more accurate. On the other hand the opposer gives evedience for the current title being the common name. Consensus is weak given the lack of participants but given that this has now been open a month I think it's the best we're going to get. Dpmuk (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

French Hill attacks → French Hill Junction attacks — These attacks (mostly) didn't take place in French Hill, but at the junction commonly known as "French Hill Junction" - which is out side of French Hill. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Google  gives me no ghits at all for the proposed title, but 824 for the existing title and all seem relevant (your results may vary). In the absence of any evidence for the common usage of the more "accurate" name, the move must be rejected in terms of WP:AT. The article text is the place to point out the actual location of the attacks. Andrewa (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on French Hill attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324211758/http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/030609/9mideast.b.htm to https://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/030609/9mideast.b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)