Talk:French battleship Liberté/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 02:53, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * comleted? This should probably be split: Liberté was laid down at the Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire shipyard in November 1902, launched on 19 April 1905, and completed in March 1908, over a year after the revolutionary British battleship HMS Dreadnought, which rendered the pre-dreadnoughts like Liberté outdated before they were comleted. Fix the spelling and link triple-expansion in the infobox.
 * All fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I meant the spelling of expansion as well, but I've taken care of that for you. Make sure to check how you handled these issues in the articles on the other ships of the class.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Why is formatting for Brassey's different than the other refs? Fix spelling of Greenwich.
 * I don't know - that's how the cite journal template formats it.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Not sure that any of these other accidents were related to Poudre B. If so, then say as much; if not then delete them.
 * It's unclear, but the one source does mention the possibility that they were all related.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for reviewing the article - I hadn't watchlisted this subpage for some reason and didn't see that you had reviewed it until now. Parsecboy (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for reviewing the article - I hadn't watchlisted this subpage for some reason and didn't see that you had reviewed it until now. Parsecboy (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for reviewing the article - I hadn't watchlisted this subpage for some reason and didn't see that you had reviewed it until now. Parsecboy (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)