Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Infobox

 * No issues

Lead

 * No issues

Design and description

 * No issues

Career

 * Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
 * The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Legacy

 * Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection
 * Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)