Talk:French cruiser Amiral Cécille/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 22:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

This article is in fine shape. I have a few nitpicks: That's all I could find. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Tage and Sfax→Sfax and Tage as that is the order they were made
 * Done
 * no range because of the sails?
 * Forgot to check Fisher for the range - it's added now
 * "Six of the guns were mounted in sponsoned on the upper deck" something missing here?
 * Fixed
 * "and the other was at the stern as a chase gun s "
 * Both the bow and stern gun were chasers
 * what was the arrangement for the secondary battery? Single mounts? Five on each broadside? Were they in sponsons?
 * Clarified
 * "to attac h k the French Mediterranean coast"
 * Good catch
 * perhaps say what type of cruisers Milan, Léger and Dubourdieu were
 * Done
 * West Coast→west coast
 * Done
 * perhaps say that Suchet, D'Assas, Troude and D'Estrées were protected cruisers
 * Done
 * add the OCLC for Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal
 * Done
 * add the ISSN for Journal of the American Society of Naval Engineers
 * Done
 * Thanks again. Parsecboy (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)