Talk:French cruiser Châteaurenault (1898)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Prose

2. Verifiability

3. Depth of Coverage ✅

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrations ✅

7. Miscellaneous

Comments
1.
 * Length is given as 140 m in the infobox, and as 135 m in the prose
 * Fixed
 * Beam is given as 17 m in the prose and as 18 m in the infobox
 * Fixed
 * Draft is given as 7.39 m in the prose and 7.5 in the infobox
 * Fixed
 * Displacement is 7898 in the prose and 8200 in the infobox
 * Fixed
 * Complement is 604 in the prose and 625 in the infobox
 * Fixed
 * Isn't it standard to have the range in the infobox?
 * Yup, good catch
 * " cast iron, AP, and SAP projectiles" - I can tell what AP and SAP stand for, but the acronyms should be introduced instead of just brought it
 * Huh, I could've sworn I did that when I wrote that section - must have gotten distracted
 * Isn't armor plating typically in the infobox for these ships, too?
 * Yes indeed - added
 * Prose says keel laying in May 1896, infobox says 12 October 1895*
 * Fixed

2.
 * The exact commissioning date of 10 October 1902 is not cited, only the month and year are.
 * Fixed
 * Namesake is not cited
 * Removed
 * Shouldn't Garbett go before Gardiner in the ordering of the references?
 * Yep
 * The succeeded by class needs cited
 * I don't think there's an expectation that nav templates need sources

3.

4.

5.

6.

7. The infobox needs quite a bit of work. Hog Farm Bacon 04:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The short description of "ship" is a bit lacking, something like "French protected cruiser" would be better.
 * Added that
 * Yeah, I forgot to overhaul the box when I finished writing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Passing. Hog Farm Bacon 02:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)