Talk:French destroyer Le Flibustier/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * but was seized by the Germans after the Italian armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
 * counter the large destroyers of the Italian Navigatori and Japanese Fubuki classes Pipe both Italian and Japanese to the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan.
 * using steam provided by four Sural-Penhöet forced-circulation boilers Link Sural-Penhöet.
 * a maximum speed of 39.1 knots (72.4 km/h; 45.0 mph) Is it possible to round the nought?
 * Nope
 * Their anti-aircraft armament consisted of one twin mount for 37 mm (1.5 in) Add "(AA)" after anti-aircraft.
 * two twin Hotchkiss 13.2 mm (0.5 in) anti-aircraft machinegun mounts Machinegun? I've never ever seen a word like that.
 * Pretty common to run them together in this country, which is why the link works
 * German request to complete her and redesignated her as FR35 Link FR35.
 * No point, it would just redirect here
 * Link Allied.
 * No edit wars.

Infobox
 * The maximum speed doesn't match with the maximum speed in the body?
 * The main body has the designed speed, 37 knots, and the results of Le Hardi's trials, 39.1 knots
 * We have no "Ordered" part in the infobox?
 * Hey Sturm could you please address this one or reply why we should not address it? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's there.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Sources
 * Is it me or there is no citation of Whitley?
 * Cite 6
 * How about Jordan & Caresse, Sturm? Does it look like there is no ref in the article about their source or is it just me? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Definitely not you, but me being in a rush to maintain my one-a-day nomination rate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No ORs.

Images That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks fine to me.
 * Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks to good to go to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)