Talk:French destroyer Panthère/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Good idea to split the long sentence. Those are the full names of the guns and should be completely italicized even if the 130 mm is the exact same as English. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! Thanks for reviewing this in between present wrapping, etc. Funny how just playing with the paper would likely delight your youngest just fine, but traditions must be observed... Merry Christmas.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Two dupe links
 * The italicized numbers in the gun names look funny to me.
 * "She was laid down...a month later" - that's a rather long sentence with a number of sub-clauses - might be worth splitting at "...vacated by her sister ship Jaguar. She was launched..."
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: