Talk:French ironclad Caïman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Review comments
Lead Infobox Service history Other stuff Looks in good order generally, minimal issues identified. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 23:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * She was the third member of the Terrible class, which included three other vessels. They were built... suggest rephrasing: She was the third of four ships of the Terrible class, built...
 * Good idea
 * The last sentence of the first para of the lead refers to the Terrible not Caiman
 * Fixed
 * ..but by the early 1900s, as numerous, more effective pre-dreadnought battleships had been built since 1890. this flows oddly. Suggest rephrasing: but by the early 1900s, as numerous, more effective pre-dreadnought battleships had been built since 1890.
 * Done
 * The torpedo tubes mentioned in the design section aren't listed in the armament section
 * Good catch
 * Perhaps add a note that the specs are as built to avoid confusion with the changes made due to the modifications in her later years?
 * Probably worthwhile to add a separate box for the refit, seeing as it was fairly significant
 * Any info on namesake? Presumably it is for the Caiman
 * Nothing I saw, but that seems fairly obvious
 * The dates for the modernisation work differs between the design section and here (1898 and 1900 respectively)
 * Fixed - 1900 is correct
 * There is a big gap in her career between 1906 and 1927, presumably a reflection on the sources. Is there even a decommissioning date?
 * No, unfortunately - Conway's is a bit sparse, and I couldn't find anything post-1906 in any of Brassey's annuals. French ships of the era aren't particularly well documented (with the exception of a handful, like FRENCH IRONCLAD Furieux).
 * No dupe links
 * No dabs or external links
 * Image tags look OK
 * Thanks Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This looks all in order. I'm satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)