Talk:French ironclad Jeanne d'Arc/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 15:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Footnote on ironcladvs vs corvettes would be good. Suggest adding this to all articles like this.
 * Agreed.
 * Should mention the beginning of the Franco-Prussian War in 1870-1871 in the Service section, as context for moving towards Prussian positions.
 * Done.
 * 'In 1875 she rammed and sank the dispatch vessel Forfait' - I'm guessing it was accidental; if so, can this be added to the sentence?
 * Done.
 * Does Rear-Admiral Bonie have a full name that can be wikilinked?
 * If I only knew it.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Rockwell in citations but not Reference section
 * Rockwell and Ward are both complete cites only used once. I can move them down to refs and change them into short cites if you'd prefer.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what the accepted practice is here. Perhaps best to put them in as short cites? At least it's all consistent that way.Skinny87 (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

An interesting article; needs a few details and then it can be passed as a GA. Skinny87 (talk) 15:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good now, so I'll get promotin'... Skinny87 (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)