Talk:French ironclad Magenta (1890)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Prose ✅

2. Verifiability ✅

3. Depth of Coverage ✅

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrations

7. Miscellaneous ✅

Comments
1. 2.
 * "They introduced the lozenge arrangement for their main battery" - Since this is talking about the class overall, I think it should be singular.
 * Changed "They" to "The ships"
 * Infobox gives two compound steam engines, text gives four. Which is correct?
 * Fixed
 * Maybe consider rephrasing "the French began rebuilding" as "The French navy began rebuilding"
 * Done
 * Infobox gives fate as scrapped, prose gives fate as "unknown".
 * Fixed
 * Namesake needs a citation
 * Removed, as I don't have a citation
 * Deck armor needs a citation
 * Added a line to the design section

3.

4.

5.

6.
 * Is the PD-US tag on file:Marceua line drawing.png appropriate since the book it's from appears to have been published in the UK not the US? I'm not an expert at file tagging.
 * It should have been PD-US-1923-abroad

7. Placing on hold, just a few issues - a couple prose issues, two inconsistencies, and a couple citations needed. Hog Farm (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Any idea why sources are so conflicting on the armament? If so, it might be worth mentioning as a note.
 * Thanks Hog Farm. Parsecboy (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Passing Hog Farm (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)