Talk:French ironclad Océan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 'Océan was a wooden-hulled, armored frigate built for the French Navy in the mid to late 1860s, the lead ship of her class.' - 'and the lead ship of her class'
 * 'Late in the ship's career four above-water 356-millimeter (14.0 in) torpedo tubes were added.' - Merge to previous paragraph to get rid of fragment sentence
 * Done and done.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Do we know why she was recalled from the blockade?
 * The entire squadron was recalled.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A small article that would seem to be as comprehensive as it can be about a ship that essentially did very little. A few points and it can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 08:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.