Talk:French submarine Mariotte/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Anything you could add to clarify what the drop collars are for non-experts? I don't think we have a link, unfortunately.
 * I wish that I did, nothing beyond the name in any of my sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I'd assume the patrols off Provence were to defend against an attack by Goeben/Breslau?
 * Probably, but uncertain since her logbook covering this time was lost with the boat.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:MARIOTTE xxx 1a.jpg - is there a better source for this? I didn't see anything on the forum that said it was from a postcard (though I didn't look very hard)
 * Replaced with a scan of the postcard.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Franse-duikboot-WO-I.jpg - needs a source
 * Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I had started looking at this the other day and then got distracted. Everything looks good to me, so passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)