Talk:Freshwater Biological Association

Advert
I have reworked a few things, and changed some wording and added sources where there were inappropriate external links in the article. I believe this is appropriate for from the article, but seek other editor's opinions on this in order to be appropriate to the nature of a wiki, and because the original intent of placing the template was to mark a deficiency into the article as collaborated, thus to remove it and say the deficiency is gone should require collaboration as well. --ForgottenHistory (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I must first declare an interest both as an ex member of the FBA and as the initiating editor of this article. However, I agree with ForgottenHistory that the  tag is no longer appropriate and that the language is now sufficiently encyclopaedic.  Velella  Velella Talk  16:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I further agree, and have removed . I've also tagged the article as  in the hope that someone will pick it up that way and expand it. A list of the numbered scientific and other publications (including those out of print) might be a useful addition. Now back to creating my article on T. T. Macan. Narky Blert (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Freshwater Biological Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100920153721/http://www.fba.org.uk/recorders to http://www.fba.org.uk/recorders

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)