Talk:Friedrichshafen FF.19/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 19:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  19:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Is there a retirement year to add to the infobox?
 * None that I've been able to find. I suspect sometime in 1915 based on the small numbers built.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Body

 * Lowercase "Operational history" in the header
 * Is there a date/year the aircraft was retired?
 * Rest looks good

Images

 * Uses fair use, but I found the same image on Flickr which could be uploaded to replace the free use image. This similar image of the same aircraft was confirmed by a Commons administrator which was uploaded from the same Flickr account, the San Diego Air and Space Museum Archive.
 * Thanks for that; I'd searched Google images without success for a copyright-free image, but it didn't turn up this one. I'll have to bookmark the SDSM for later use.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Other

 * Focused on topic
 * Neutral
 * Stable
 * Good coverage for the information available

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I've done my review of the article and left some comments. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  20:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * All done. Thanks for taking this on.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good. I'll pass this review. PizzaKing13   ¡Hablame!  07:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)