Talk:Friedrichshafen FF.31/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 11:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias (he/him) • talk 11:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Images

 * 6a. Symbol confirmed.svg Only one image provided, which is appropriately licensed.
 * 6b. Symbol confirmed.svg Only one image provided, which is relevant, and appropriately captioned.

Prose

 * 1a. Symbol question.svg One very minor query:
 * "..from in his position in the front cockpit." Too many "in"s?
 * 1b. Symbol question.svg A couple of queries:
 * Despite being a very short article, the MOS asks that the lead provide a summary of the content contained in the main body. In this article, a couple of facts are present in the lead, but not the body, specifically that it was a two-seat plane, that it was built by Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, and that it was during the First World War.
 * It was fitted with two open cockpits in the nacelle. covers two seats, I think. You are correct about not mentioning the builder. The 1915 date in the lede and the main body should tie into WW1 pretty solidly.
 * Consider getting rid of the "Operators" section. It is currently unreferenced, and according to the prose, calling the German Imperial Navy an operator is stretching the truth: they tried a prototype and deemed it not fit for service.
 * Good idea.


 * 3a. Symbol question.svg Some queries:
 * Could it be worth adding that the FF.27, which this was developed from, was also not mass-produced. From the article on that plane, it looks like only one of those was ever built?
 * Correct, but I'm not sure that that's actually significant.
 * At the moment FF.37 redirects here. A small amount of information is presented here, but not much. I understand that the two were fundamentally the same plane, but do we have any figures on how many FF.37s were built etc, or are you planning to spin out a separate article for that?
 * No, especially since I have no info on performance for either aircraft. I've clarified that only one FF.37 was built and that it was also rejected for service.
 * 3b. Symbol confirmed.svg No concerns.
 * 4. Symbol confirmed.svg No concerns.
 * 5. Symbol confirmed.svg No concerns.

That's the lot. Harrias (he/him) • talk 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your time; I think that I've dealt with all the issues that you raised. Let me know if you feel that more needs to be done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The changes you've made give me no further concerns against the criteria. Nice work. Harrias  (he/him) • talk 19:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)