Talk:Frige

Should Merge into Frigg Article
Most of this article should be merged into the recently rewritten Frigg article and/or is redundant in the face of a solid Anglo-Saxon paganism article. The Frigg article needs expanding, and some of the material found here would be very helpful in doing so. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Neopaganism section is an irrelevant canard
I had already pared off two Neopagan /Wiccan sub sections here and now looking at it the remaining section about Contemporary Paganism seems itself to be largely irrelevant to the the topics of this article. Earrach (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)