Talk:Fritchley Tunnel

grade rating
Note: two sources appear to clash on the grade rating, if any, of this bridge: the Derby Telegraph says this is Grade II listed: the English Heritage register entry says no grade level applies to this case. I've gone with the Derby Telegraph because it's a secondary source, per standard procedure. But which is right? -- The Anome (talk) 10:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for creating this, I was about to. I've seen grade II listed mentioned in the press too, but according to, as well as the source in the article, it is actually a scheduled monument. It might well be both, with the press coverage relating to the more recent listing. Nice to get this to DYK, if it could be expanded to meet the minimum size. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've nominated it at DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Fritchley Tunnel. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've also recategorized the article to reflect its status as a scheduled ancient monument, instead of a listed building. -- The Anome (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fritchley Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216221013/http://butterleygangroadproject.com/ to http://butterleygangroadproject.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)