Talk:Frog cake/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for Good Article candidacy. Those things look so tasty! Check back soon for a review. I wonder if GA reviewers should make a rule that we must try the tasty treats as extra incentive for reviewing them... ;) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It would be a good rule. In which case I'll volunteer to review Deep-fried mars bar. :) - Bilby (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ahhhh, if only I could do the same thing without putting on a ton of pounds! :)


 * This article very easily passes the GA criteria. Although it is short, I understand that a ton of information will more than likely not be found on the subject, especially since it's only a food subject. I only ask for you to do one thing before this can pass.


 * "On the minus side, the success of the frog cake has led to imitations, so in 2001 Balfours registered both the name and the shape of the product as a trademark." - "On the minus side" is too POV-ish, I recommend that you correct that sentence. It really won't even take too long, and this article is on hold until this HUGE GIGANTIC ENORMOUS edit is done. ;) Send me a message on my talkpage when you finish! CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. It took a lot of work, but extensive research to fix the wording was the key. :) btw, I was wondering about the size too, so I checked some of the other food articles - in this case I figured that there wasn't really anything left to say. - Bilby (talk)


 * OK, the article can pass now... except you must give me 1,000 of those tasty looki... I mean, nevermind. The article has passed, great job! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)