Talk:Frontier Communications/Archives/2016

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Frontier Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040521091226/http://www.pulp.tc:80/case00-c-1415globalcrossing.pdf to http://www.pulp.tc/case00-c-1415globalcrossing.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Information About the Company When it Was Citizens Utilities
check out these links they have more information:

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/citizens-utilities-company-history/

-older history of the company when it was still citizens utilities

http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/32/Citizens-Communications-Company.html

-more recent history of its divestment out of oil and how it became Frontier Communications

Edit Request: Remove Old Logo
Remove old logo from page body. Deant frontier (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌. Historical logos are a valid inclusion in encyclopedic coverage of the subject. Please state why you think the old logo should be removed. And just because it's the old logo that the company doesn't want used anymore is not a valid reason. oknazevad (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

We appreciate your help in removing this from the page, as it is misleading to Wiki readers. Removing the logo will help improve the accuracy of the information contained in this page, as well as minimize confusion for your readers.

There is also no need for this logo placement to begin with (within the body content). The correct logo is displaying as it should, within the company summary box. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deant frontier (talk • contribs) 16:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Again, no. Historical logos, properly identified, are a matter of public interest. There is no inaccuracy in identifying a historical logo. The chances of confusion are slim. oknazevad (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Is there another editor or supervisor we can make this request to? We also do not understand why this instance of the logo even exists within the page section we are referring to (this logo placement is in the "Global Crossing and Commonwealth transactions" section of the article). The primary logo being displayed in the summary box is fine.

If there's an opportunity here to improve the quality and accuracy of content, I would imagine you would be open to that.

Thank you in advance for your continued consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deant frontier (talk • contribs) 18:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)