Talk:Frozen (2013 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Prashant! (talk · contribs) 06:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

— Prashant 09:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Refrences
 * Why some publishers are linked and others are not wikilinked?
 * Please, Be consistent with the linking.


 * Lead
 * "Inspired by Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tale The Snow Queen, and featuring the voices of Kristen Bell, Idina Menzel, Jonathan Groff, Josh Gad, and Santino Fontana, the film tells the story of a fearless princess who sets off on an epic journey alongside a rugged mountain man, his loyal pet reindeer, and a hapless snowman to find her estranged sister, whose icy powers have inadvertently trapped the kingdom in eternal winter."
 * What is the need for such a long sentence, please split it.


 * Third paragraph of the lead doesn't work for me. I mean, the beginning talks about release and without critical reception, it talks about gross and then reception is mentioned. Please, mention its critical reception first followed by its box office records.— Prashant 09:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

You may see the talk page for the references fixing. For the linking, some of the publishers don't have a wiki article, while some others (as far I checked a few) are poorly written, eg. Entertainment Weekly. I think the editors have their own discretion in this issue. I'll raise a discussion in order to gather their explanations.

Meanwhile, I'm going to fix the lead as you mentioned. It should be done within 30 minutes or so. Forbidden User (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Prashant!, please review the article again with our recent fixes. Thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 07:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Plot
 * Why Hans, Olaf and Kristoff is not linked like Anna and Elsa? Please link it to existing articles.— Prashant 06:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The plot was written way before the pages' creation. I've done the work. Thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Later efforts
 * "In the late 1990s, Walt Disney Feature Animation started on their own adaptation of The Snow Queen after the tremendous success of their recent films, but the project was scrapped." Why don't you name some films? Like Beauty and the Beast or The Little Mermaid.
 * "Disney shelved the project again" I think you should merge it with another sentence.— Prashant 13:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Revitalization
 * "The studio has a tradition of screening animated films in development every twelve weeks, then holding lengthy "notes sessions" in which its directors and screenwriters from different projects provide extensive "notes" on each other's work." Its directors or their directors, we are talking about lot of animated films. Aren't we?— Prashant 13:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅ Regarding the former comment, I added Disney Renaissance as a general statement for all WDAS animated features during the 1990s. The short sentence you mentioned was also lengthened in order to avoid its becoming odd. For the latter one, "its" here refers to "the studio's," but if you think it's unclear I can further clarify the sentence. Thanks! ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 15:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * We wish to hear more from you, Prashant! (it's been a while). ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 01:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Make sure that the wikilink appears at the first mention (only once) of the articles (from development section), for example John Lasseter is mentioned before but, is linked at fourth or fifth mention. Check whole article for this.— Prashant 03:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, I didn't found any other problems with the article.— Prashant 12:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Pretty good effort overall, thanks for addressing the points and sorry for the delay.— Prashant 12:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh thanks Prashant! It's a great encouragement to me as a somewhat newcomer! My gratitude to Quenhitran and other editors who helped!Forbidden User (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)