Talk:Fu-Go balloon bomb/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 00:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I'll go ahead and review this article. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  00:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Looks good

Lead

 * Looks good

Background

 * Remove "founded in 1927" since its not relevant to the 1933 balloon program
 * Removed and replaced with the laboratory's purpose.
 * Do we know why the 1933 project ended?
 * I was unable to find this information.
 * Link "Imperial Navy" at its first mention
 * Linked.

Design and development

 * Looks good

Offensive and defenses

 * Delink "radiosonde" as it was already linked in the previous section
 * Delinked.
 * Do we know what Mexican states balloons were reported in to keep consistency with listing the US states and Canadian provinces/territories? This map shows balloons reported in North Territory of Baja California (183) and Sonora (147).
 * Mikesh confirms the Mexican states, added.

Abandonment and results

 * Looks good

Single lethal attack

 * Is there a citation for the line "becoming the only fatalities from Axis action in the continental U.S. during the war"?
 * Cited to the NRHP record.

After World War II

 * Looks good

Images

 * All images have proper licenses
 * All images have appropriate captions

Overall

 * Stable, no war edits
 * Neutral POV
 * Focused on topic
 * Broad in coverage

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I've finished my review of the article and left some comments. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  00:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now. Good job on this article. PizzaKing13   ¡Hablame!  01:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)