Talk:Fuck the Facts

Fuck the Facts 2.0
After this page got deleted, I began work on a new one and here it is. Thanks to user:Zblewski for his help with this. I also made articles for a few of FTF's albums. I think all of their albums and EPs should have articles. Some of the splits are more notable than others so I was thinking of making 1 article with all of the splits on it in detail. But time will tell...Ibanez Guy (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Happy to help.-- Z blewski  |talk   04:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Some comments on referencing
Yo guys, great work on the article so far. The citations need work though; the links in the References section look self-published and unreliable, while the links in the Media and Interviews section look more like reliable sources. I recommend you read WP:RS to get an idea of what is acceptable as a source. The Good article criteria include the following:
 * 2. :
 * 2(a) ; and
 * 2(b)
 * 2(c)

The article would fail a GA nomination in its current state. Good luck with bringing it up to standard, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. Mahalo, the skomorokh  14:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

GA fail
I am failing this article because is fails #3 on the "quick-fail" criteria, as it still has a cleanup tag primarysources. Also, it lacks in-line citations. On top of that, it has far too many redlinks. Feel free to fix these problems and renominate this article! -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 20:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh well, it was worth a try. Regarding the red links, should most, if not all, just be converted to text? I see that red links encourage the creation of new articles, but I don't see most of these linked bands/record labels being notable. Even with that, I kind of find it awkward to find bands and record labels not linked to, even if they're not notable, but hey, I guess it's Wikipedia's standards.  As for the in-line citations, that will be fixed soon enough, I hope; the tags were placed in the article after I nominated it. --GVOLTT How's my editing?\My contribs 21:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This article still contains original research. It's a really good article, very well-written and informative, but I don't think it stands a chance at GA until inline citations are provided for all the information. Aryder779 (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fuck the Facts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.attackfanzine.net/oldsite/fuckfact.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.decibelmagazine.com/upfront/sep2006/fuckthefacts.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218213007/http://ftf.electrocutionerdz.com/index2.htm to http://ftf.electrocutionerdz.com/index2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fuck the Facts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207065936/http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view to http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=3028679&blogId=521568063

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)