Talk:Fucked Fucked Company

Restored After 2nd Deletion
Previously there were five comments here asking that the article not be speedy deleted and at least be considered under normal deletion policy. Apparently Redvers deleted that and the main article also. To date, no comments yet on my talk page despite asking for them from Redvers, nor any discussion. Is this the wiki way? For heaven's sake you have at least three people contesting the deletion who have taken the time to comment on the discussion page within one hour otf the page being created. A hangon tag was also placed on the article. Yet the article is erased without discussion. MrGorman 19:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Why was FFC deleted before a discussion of the issues?
This article deserves to exist. Why have the admins arbitrarily deleted it? Why not delete the fuckedcompany article as well?

I think what's clear is an overzealous and judgmentally overpowered editing regime on the part of Wiki. FFC exists, therefore by the same measure of value that FC as it's predecessor existed warrants an entry. Why is it up to the wiki associates to judge the merit of a web site?

Get off your high horses! Signed, - Wet Butthole.

It's forty teenagers talking about caring for cats, the proper method to prepare rice and the best way to be popular when in prison. Not worthy of being documented. Dropkick them to the curb. -- Leprechaun's Mom

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review Don't Delete FFC! -- Joey K.

For Heaven's sake!