Talk:Fuecoco/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 02:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Will review this! Comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Pokelego999 @Cukie Gherkin Here are my short comments, hope they can be addressed. :) Arconning (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Arconning I believe I've addressed all relevant prose issues. I additionally found an Inverse source to replace the CBR source. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Pokelego999 @Cukie Gherkin One more issue, the CBR source is still used in the article. Hope this can be fixed. :) Arconning (talk) 07:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Arconning fixed, apologies for missing that. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

 * Mentions of Fire type, Ghost typing, and similar words should be hyphenated.

Lead and infobox

 * No issues.

Conception and development

 * Just add a little comma after the player assumes the role of a Pokémon Trainer.

Appearances

 * No issues.

Critical reception

 * No issues.

Image

 * Image present is on a free use license which makes sense in this situation.

Refs

 * Earwig seems good!
 * Random ref check: 1, 7, 11, 14, 18, good.
 * After a consensus was made, reference 4 should probably be replaced as it's unreliable per WikiProject Video games/Sources. Though I'll give a situational pass if there aren't any other sources, as some editors have also deemed it situational per information given. Let me know if you've seen any other reference that could be of us
 * Conditional passes on references mentioning ScreenRant.

Misc

 * No ongoing edit war, focused and broad information regarding the topic, neutral.