Talk:Fulkerson–Chen–Anstee theorem

Berger 2014
"Berger [4] reinvented this result and gives a direct proof." I've just checked the cited paper and it does not look like a direct proof to move. It proves a more general statement, but only using the Fulkerson–Chen–Anstee theorem. I'm also not sure what "reinvented" is supposed to mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.99.67.178 (talk) 19:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)