Talk:Full Bloom (Kara album)

Merger proposal
I propose merging the articles Damaged Lady and Runaway (Kara song) into this one, Full Bloom (Kara album). There's not that much on the song articles that isn't also on this album, and most songs shouldn't have their own articles anyway per WP:SONGS. The album article could be more comprehensive with that extra song info in it, making one high quality article instead of stringing info out between three articles. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Since there are no comments, I'll go ahead with the merges. Feel free to edit and continue to improve the resulting article when I'm done. :) Shinyang-i (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

There was no discussion. Please unmerge the articles. The songs are notable. The article were expandable. By redirecting them, you prevented people from expanding them. You denied Wikipedia the opportunity to grow. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The discussion was open for over a month. The banners were at the top of every single involved article for over a month. I didn't prevent you from putting in your opinion during that time.  And you will have to provide good evidence that the songs were notable, though I suggest a thorough perusal of the notability requirements of songs before you start talking.  And not only do songs have to meet rather high notability requirements, there has to be adequate non-trivial information from reliable secondary sources to fill an article of reasonable length, so that even many notable songs don't merit articles because there simply isn't much to really say about them.  Filling the page up with a bunch of tables and day-by-day details about when teaser photos were released ain't gonna cut it.  You will also have to put up a very good argument as to why these minor Kara songs should stray from the recommendations of every single Wikipedia guideline regarding song articles.  So how about you write up some articles on these songs in adherence with all applicable policies in your sandbox, and then we'll revisit the issue of whether these things should be un-reverted. Shinyang-i (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * For the record, I didn't participate in this merge discussion because I support Shinyang-i's merges in general. Like Shinyang-i said, the discussion was open for over a month and anyone could have commented during that time. Random86 (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)