Talk:Functor category

Untitled
"a standard construction embeds a given category in a functor category; the functor category has much nicer properties than the original category, allowing to perform certain operations that were not available in the original setting.": 'allowing to perform'? Is that really English? Would it lose rigour, accuracy, conciseness, or other necessary property if written as 'allowing' or as 'allowing the performance of' or 'enabling'??? (I am guessing the author is trying to avoid using a person-specifying term such as 'you' or 'one' as in 'allowing you to perform' or 'allowing one to perform'? But I am not sure how important the term 'perform' is; what do the to my mind possibly extraneous words 'to perform' add that necessitate adding them instead of sticking to a concise construction such as 'allowing' or 'enabling'????)

Knotwork (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Functor category. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031025120434/http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~tl/book.html to http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~tl/book.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)