Talk:Fundamental Laws of England

New Discussion
This is a nice page. Have edited it to reflect my contribution to wikipedia of the Thoburn v Sunderland City Council Case and have used the nicley pre-typed judgment in the Thoburn case from this page, thank you. Will 13:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Old discussion from vfd
Article kept on April 18, 2004

--
 * nonsence, ping
 * Agree, total nonsense. Delete -- Graham :) | Talk 16:01, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 16:43, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Everyking 20:52, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Stormie 23:52, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Marnanel 01:38, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * fundamental nonsense. Exploding Boy 02:04, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to British constitutional law -- Smerdis of Tlön 02:06, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stupid prank. Cribcage 22:02, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is total crap. Jacob1207 23:07, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete; nonsense. &mdash;Psychonaut 16:31, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, and add to Pages needing attention. Often referred to in English legal history. -- Zigger 17:15, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fundamentally flawed. Pteron 20:38, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Total nonsense. Arwel 12:07, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Wrote a new article on the topic - please revisit. -- Zigger 20:15, 2004 Apr 17 (UTC)
 * No longer nonsense, keep -- Cyrius|&#9998 20:24, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. 185 Google hits, in keeping with the new article. -- The Anome 20:28, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Much better in its new form. Keep. Arwel 20:53, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Merge
Isn't half of this just repeating the UK constitution article? Francium12 (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Lack of Subjectivity
Isn't this merely the 'Whig interpretation of history'?

I have added the POV template. The article implies that a) there are fundamental laws of England - is that a fact? and b) that the laws and documents listed are such fundamental laws - in whose opinion?

--Utinomen (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Your question is answered by the first sentence of the article "William Blackstone described the Fundamental Laws of England in Commentaries on the Laws of England" and goes on to describe others. It is not a clear-cut matter as to what are the fundamental laws of England but then few topics are clear-cut if examined in sufficient detail. --IanOfNorwich (talk) 11:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Fundamental Laws of England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20031219101110/http://www.strecorsoc.org:80/docs/defence2.html to http://www.strecorsoc.org/docs/defence2.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040102172147/http://www.strecorsoc.org:80/docs/vindicated2.html to http://www.strecorsoc.org/docs/vindicated2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fundamental Laws of England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130329045450/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/bk1ch1.htm to http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/bk1ch1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)