Talk:Fundraiser (The Office)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of article is good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Article complies with MoS.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Good.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Sources included where needed.
 * C. No original research:
 * No original research found.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
 * B. Focused:
 * Article remains focused at all times.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Fair-use image is licensed properly and other image is released into the public domain.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Images are provided and appropriate and contain suitable captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Nothing needs to be fixed in this article. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)