Talk:Funny Gay Males

The article has a few good sources and some good information, but is rather short and lacking details. The second source that was cited, a Baltimore Sun article, has a dead link that is not accessible. The information that is present is presented well in a neutral stance, only stating facts and not any opinions. I would give this a score of Start, as it has the beginnings of a good article, but is too short and needs to be more fully developed. TribstyAnn (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)