Talk:Furt/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  02:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nice job with the article... everything appears to be in the green! We Pass! Kudos on your first GA nom :)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  05:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Starting work on number two; it'll probably take me about a week if this article was any indication. I'm aiming for finishing number three by the end of the month. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Furt passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: