Talk:FutureWeapons

Merger
I suggested a merger because while the other article has all the content of this and more, the naming concern is what separates this from the other. However, there is no point to separate articles because of a name, so they should really just be merged. - User:Turboduded
 * I Agree, a merger is a good idea--Porsche997SBS 02:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

---Another reason to merge is that the other article makes points that were first presented in this one, and except for the featured weapons subtitle and better organization, it is esentially the same.

Naming Concerns
Another article was created after this one about the same TV show. The creator of that article created it unknowingly of this article. But that article has indeed supassed this in content, giving this article a reason for its own deletion. One may argue that this article has the correct name (without a space in between the Future and the Weapons); this, however, is a misconception. The Discovery Channel has identified the show with a space and without one. The "Name Card", in this case, may not be used then, as neither article has the advantage. So, in conclusion that article should remain in existance while this should not, as that article contains more content. --Porsche997SBS 02:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)