Talk:Future Shock (FlashForward)

Plot summary too long
As with so many TV episodes, this plot summary is far too long. This is not only an issue with WP's MOS, but might actually entail legal issues with copyright infringements. The plot summary should be trimmed down to the recommended size, which is less than 500 words. This is over 2,000 at the moment. Lampman (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Future Shock (FlashForward). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100518070837/http://www.sevensidedcube.net:80/entertainment/2010/heroes-and-flashforward-cancelled to http://www.sevensidedcube.net/entertainment/2010/heroes-and-flashforward-cancelled

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Removing from Category:Television series set in the 2010s
I have removed this article from Category:Television series set in the 2010s as I think it is inappropriate for it to be included in this category. My reasoning is firstly that the said category is for television series, but this article is about an individual episode of the television series FlashForward and as such does not fit the parameters of the category. I can see no other individual episodes from TV series within the category. Secondly it clearly states on the category's page that it is for "Television shows whose events take place in the 2010s but which were made before that decade". While I am aware that this episode contains flashes into the future, many of which at least are clearly intended to take place later in the 2010s, the fact that the episode was broadcast in 2010 (ie within the decade in question) would again seem to prohibit the article's inclusion in the category. Dunarc (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)